What Will California do if the Initial State Water Project Allocation does not Increase Substantially?

In a move that seemed to surprise many interested parties, the California State Department of Water Resources (DWR) decided on an initial allocation of 5% of maximum deliveries to the 29 water contractors using the State Water Project. The initial allocation, while not unprecedented (the lowest initial allocation, also at 5% came in 2010 after the three year drought between 2007 and 2009) has raised concerns about long-term water supplies, storage, and a host of other issues. While DWR will likely raise the final allocation above 5%, California still faces tough challenges in managing drought conditions and economic growth in the long term. In this piece, I would like to address some of the reactions to the initial allocation and how California can plan for prolonged drought in the future.

But first a bit of background. The State Water Project is a system of reservoirs and aqueducts that delivers water from Northern California to customers in Central and Southern California. There are 29 state water contractors that have access to this water. The maximum amount of water that the SWP can deliver is 4.4 million acre feet. About 70% of the SWP supply goes to urban uses, and the remaining 30% goes to agricultural uses. The State Water Project theoretically can deliver 4.4 million acre feet to its contractors, but it rarely does. The amount of water that the State Water Project delivers varies widely from year to year.

All the water resources in California rely on a sizeable snowpack. However, the amount of snowfall that the western United States varies widely from year to year and the amount of water that water districts can receive from the public projects varies accordingly. Each year, the California Department of Water Resources will survey the snowpack and the amount of precipitation the state has received in areas where its water supplies originate. The department will compare the year’s snowpack to historical averages and make a determination of how much water it will grant to the state water contractors. This is the initial estimated allocation. As the rainy season progresses, DWR will make the final allocation determination for deliveries. Please see the table below for the historical yields that the State Water Project actually delivers. The light blue line shows the initial allocation, the dark blue line the final allocation.

SWP Figure 1


SWP Allocations

As you can see from the data, DWR sometimes raises the final allocation higher than the initial allocation estimates. In 2006, DWR raised the final allocation to 100% of deliveries. DWR issued the same 5% initial allocation in 2010, and they eventually raised the final deliveries to 50%. This year follows a similar scenario to 2010. The state faced drought conditions between 2007 and 2009, and reservoir levels dropped throughout that period. Higher-than-forecasted rainfalls during the 2010 winter helped to alleviate the drought and boost deliveries. Water users in California are hoping for similar winter weather conditions. Some pundits however are not as optimistic that the State will raise the final allocations.

There are a few main reasons why it looks like 2014 will continue to face water challenges. First, we rely on Mother Nature to provide us with replenished water resources, and the forecasts show that she likely will not be cooperative. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicts that this winter will be dryer than usual in parts of the Southwest and Southeast (Please see the graphic below). This is particularly challenging for California because we receive the vast majority of the year’s rainfall in the winter. We receive on average approximately 70% of our rainfall for the year in December and January, and approximately 90% of our rainfall between November and March. A dry winter could have lasting implications on the state’s water resources for the rest of the year.


Second, the State’s main reservoirs are already well below historical averages in some instances. According to the State Department of Water Resources, Lake Oroville, the SWP’s main reservoir is at 41% of capacity. Lake Oroville is on average at 66% of its capacity at this date. Lake Shasta, the Central Valley Project’s largest reservoir is at 37% capacity versus the average at 61% of capacity on this date. As such, officials may be reluctant to increase deliveries significantly until the reservoirs recover closer to historical averages.

Meanwhile, the demands of thirsty end users and the elected officials that represent them will pull DWR in the opposite direction. When the news of the 5% initial allocation came out, many pundits and elected officials weighed in on the historically low projections. In a news release, Congressman Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield stated, “It continues to be unacceptable that our constituents do not get the water they contract and pay for in full. Our state needs an affordable and reliable water supply to ensure a strong and vibrant economy, and I call on the Administration to take immediate action to increase vital water supplies for our communities.” Other groups, from ACWA to Senator Jean Fuller urged groups to back the Bay Delta Conservation Plan which they argue would increase water storage capacity across the state.

What are we to make of all of this? Clearly we need to do something to plan more appropriately for unreliable future water supplies in California. But we have to do it in the right manner. As Rod Smith pointed out in his piece on the BDCP and water supply reliability (Click here for the article), the BDCP does nothing to ensure future water supplies in California without a robust storage system. We need much larger storage capacities than we have now to provide us with water supplies in lean years. It is unclear if the BDCP will provide us with a larger and more firm water supply.

However, what is clear is that we cannot rely on Mother Nature yearly to supply us with new supplies on demand. We can build storage to capture as much rainfall in wet years. We cannot build a single new drop of supply. As such, I believe that our that our leaders should focus on storage and maximizing water capture during the rainy years Mother Nature gives us. Many organizations, including the Association of California Water Agencies and the State Water Contractors Association (SWCA) agree that storage capacity is key to our future water supplies. After DWR released its initial allocation figures, SWCA General Manager Terry Erlewine commented, “We lost an opportunity earlier this year to capture a significant amount of water due to our outdated water system. If we had a more modern water delivery system in place, like that proposed under the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, we would have more water in storage and today’s low allocation announcement wouldn’t be so dire.” Without this focus, we will only continue to fight over scarcer and scarcer water resources during the lean years like we are facing now.

This entry was posted in Bay Delta Conservation Plan, Restructure California State Water Project, Storage, Supply Reliability on by .

About Jeff Simonetti

Jeff Simonetti is the Vice President of Public Affairs at the Capitol Core Group and provides project management, business development, and policy/lobbying expertise to a variety of federal, state and local clients. During his tenure at Capitol Core, Jeff has among other projects helped a renewable energy company to secure authorizing resolutions in cities across Southern California. Prior to joining Capitol Core Group, Jeff was a Vice President at the Kosmont Companies, a real estate and economic development consulting firm. At Kosmont, Jeff was the project lead for cities looking to implement financing strategies such as Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFDs) and other post-redevelopment funding mechanisms. He also was the project manager for the Economic Development element of the Fontana General Plan Update. Jeff gained significant state and local government affairs experience as the Government Affairs Director at the Building Industry Association (BIA) of Southern California’s Baldy View Chapter. During his tenure at the BIA, he helped to found the annual San Bernardino County Water Conference, an event that gathers over 400 elected officials and business leaders in the region to discuss the pressing water policy issues that affect the community.

3 thoughts on “What Will California do if the Initial State Water Project Allocation does not Increase Substantially?

  1. water worker

    Thanks Jeff – the added table does help clarify SWP delivery history. If Table 1 had a third line that showed actual deliveries it would be even more useful. Thanks.

  2. water worker

    I am confused by the SWP Allocations table. It appears that SWP usually made full deliveries (4.2 MAF) until 1989 but that seems incorrect. I don’t think the full amount was even requested until about 1989. Does the 100% line represent the initial requests by the contractors and not the full 4.2 MAF that is contracted? If so, the table is very misleading and needs a fuller explanation. A second table that documents actual annual deliveries would help clarify SWP historic ability to meet demand.

    1. Jeff Simonetti Post author

      Hello Water Worker,
      I added a second chart that I hope clarifies your question. You are correct that the State Water Project was not physically able to deliver the current potential 4 million + AF of water per yer until the very late 1980s. The first chart that I added shows the Table A Amount (potential amounts if DWR grants 100% of deliveries) in blue versus the initial requests in red.

Comments are closed.