Texas Representative Allan Ritter (R-Netherland) recently introduced HB 4 and HB 11 to finance the Texas Water Plan through a one-time $2 billion capitalization of a dedicated revolving fund. The legislation will also address the fund’s management and operation. This post discusses two key aspects of revolving funds that will shape how far the Texas Water Development Board (“TWDB”) can stretch the $2 billion capitalization to meet Texas’s financing needs: Continue reading
Author Archives: Rodney T. Smith
Minute 319 Sets Pathway for Long-term Mexico-US Water Projects
Last November, CILA Commissioner Roberto Salmon and IBWC Commissioner Edward Drusina signed Minute 319 of the 1944 US-Mexico Treaty. Reflecting over a decade of consultations, Minute 319 addresses interim international joint cooperative measures that improve water management in the Colorado River Basin (for copy of minute and press release, go to Water Strategist Community at www.waterchat.com and search site for “Minute 319”). In this post, I discuss how the minute’s sections on international projects and water exchanges related to the 2010 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Intentionally Created Mexican Allocation (“ICMA”) and water for the environment pilot program set the pathway for long-term Mexico-US cooperation in bi-national water projects. Continue reading
Project Evaluation II: Thoughts about Interest Rates
Interest rates used in project evaluation should command the attention of anyone interested in water projects. The lower (or higher) the interest rate used in project evaluation, the more (less) likely a given project will be judged economically viable. The interest rate issue should NOT be viewed as an issue in the exclusive domain of economists and financiers. Otherwise, project evaluation will be co-opted by “off-line” discussions among economists and financiers selecting the interest rate. Continue reading
Market Mechanisms Address Controversy in Member Agency Decision-Making
Water agencies face decisions about significant investments in water resources. Some projects enhance the reliability of existing service. Others expand the ability to meet new demands. Do project benefits justify project costs? Member agencies with different goals or opportunities may come to different conclusions. Investment decisions become controversial. What can be done? Continue reading